SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 48

WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORITY FOR CLARIFICATION AND ADVANCE RULING VINIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA – Respondent


RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant is a registered dealer under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (KST Act for short ). The appellant is the Licence and registered user of the Trade Mark Whirlpool in terms of the Trademark and Tradename Licence Agreement dated 24-2-1995 executed between M/s Whirlpool Corporation, USA, who is stated to be the proprietor and owner of the said Trade Mark and the Appellant. The licence granted to the appellant to use the Trade Mark is non-transferable.

( 2 ) ON 4-2-2003, the Appellant entered into an agreement with M/s Applicomp India Limited (for short APPLICOMP or the MANUFACTURER) under which APPLICOMP agreed to manufacture and supply electronic products and electrical appliances such as Refrigerators, Washing Machines, Air Conditioner etc. , to the Appellant on Original Equipment Manufacture basis, as per the specifications of the appellant. Relevant portions of clauses 4, 5, and 6 of the Agreement are extracted below: the manufacturer is exempted from payment of Sales Tax for the goods manufactured at its factory at Hosur Road, Attibele. . "4. The buyer hereby warrants that the Buyer is the owner of all rights in the Trademark Whirlpool and has th















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top