SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 15

S.N.KUMAR
CHEMBRA ORCHARD PRODUCE LIMITED, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
NIL – Respondent


Advocates:
R.VEERENDRA SHARMA

S. N. KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE six companies have presented these company applications under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking appropriate directions fo. convening of the meetings of the shareholders and creditors of the respective companies and for dispensation with the holding of such meetings. The office has raised objection regarding maintainability of a single/common application by six companies which reads as under. As per Section 391 (l) (b ). . . "on the application of the company or of any creditor or member of the company", a single application with separate number is not maintainable in respect of six companies.

( 2 ) IN reply to the said office objections, learned Counsels for the applicants requested the office to place the matter before the Court to hear regarding office objections. Accordingly, the matter was placed before the Court. As the objection raised by the office was purely a question of law regarding maintainability of a common application by several companies who are parties to a scheme of arrangement or a scheme of amalgamation, notice was ordered to the Registrar of companies to elicit his views in the matter. The Court also directed Sri ad




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top