SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 191

RAM MOHAN REDDY, S.R.NAYAK
ABRAHAM G. KARIMPANAL – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ravi Malimath, Subhash Mallapur

S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants herein being aggrieved by the order dated 6-9-2003 passed in G and WC No. 61 of 2003 on the file of the II Additional Principal Judge, Family court at Bangalore, for short, 'the Family court' have preferred this appeal under Section 47 of the GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT, 1890, 1890, for short, 'the Act'.

( 2 ) THE Family Court by the impugned order has returned the petition filed by the appellants herein under Sections 7, 10 and 26 of the Act for presentation of the same before the jurisdictional Court in the State of Tamilnadu having opined that it has no jurisdiction to entertain that petition.

( 3 ) THE case of the appellants, in brief, is as follows : the first and second appellants are a couple of Indian Nationality and Domicile. The appellants 1 and 2 are aged about 33 and 32 years respectively. The first appellant was born on 16-2-1970 and second appellant on 15-1 -1971. The first appellant and the second appellant were married on 4-1-1996. The first appellant is employed as a Consultant at Orchard Advertising Pvt. Ltd. , Bangalore and his monthly salary from the said profession at. present is Rs. 52,500/ -. The second appellant is a housewif





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top