SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 289

N.K.PATIL, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, GULBARGA – Appellant
Versus
SUBHAS – Respondent


Advocates:
R.S.SIDHAPURKAR, S.V.HEGDE MUKHAND

R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) RESPONDENT herein was the driver of lorry bearing Registration No. CAM-105 of which second appellant is the owner and first appellant is the insurer. Respondent sustained an employment injury on 4-2-1996 when driving the said lorry. He sustained serious injuries to the right leg (comminuted fracture of middle and lower one-third of right fibula, oblique fracture of midshaft of right tibia, fracture of head of left fibula, fracture of lower pole of right patella and oblique comminuted fracture of distal shaft of second metatarsal ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed a claim petition (W. C. No. 4 of 1996) under section 10 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 ('act' for short), praying for award of Rupees Three lakhs as compensation, in respect of the said injuries. In the claim petition the respondent (also referred to as the 'workman') averred that he was aged 35 years and was getting a salary of Rs. 2,000/- per month apart from Rs. 25a per day as batta, at the time of accident. He also stated that he was hospitalised between 4-2-1996 and 11-5-1996 for treatment and was advised further treatment and bed rest for another six months. He contended that he suffere


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top