SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 417

P.VISHWANATHA SHETTY, S.ABDUL NAZEER
SARO JAMMA – Appellant
Versus
NEELAMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
C.H.JADHAV, H.R.Prasad

S. ABDUL NAZEER, J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal the appellants have called in question the correctness of the judgment and decree dated 28th November, 2002 made in O. S. No. 84 of 1996 by the I Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), davanagere (hereinafter referred to as 'the Trial Court' ). While the appellants in this appeal were the plaintiffs in the suit, respondents were the defendants. The parties in this appeal, in the course of the judgment will be referred to by their status as in the Trial Court.

( 2 ) THE 1st plaintiff claims that she was the wife of Kuruvathi basavarajappa and plaintiffs 2 and 3 are the children of the 1st plaintiff born to the said Kuruvathi Basavarajappa and while the 1st defendant is one other wife of the said Kuruvathi Basavarajappa, the defendants 2 to 7 were also the children of the 1st defendant-Kuruvathi basavarajappa, the said Kuruvathi Basavarajappa had expired on 14-3-1992. Inspite of the demand made by the plaintiffs for allotment of their 42/100th share and possession of suit schedule property, the defendants having denied the same, the plaintiffs were constrained to file the suit seeking for partition and separate possession of their share in

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top