ASHOK B.HINCHIGERI, V.GOPALA GOWDA
KRISHNA KEDARNATH – Appellant
Versus
SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two appeals are filed against the orders dated 10-1-2005 passed by the Trial Court on LA. No. II filed by the UCO Bank under order 7, Rule 11 of the CPC rejecting the plaints holding that the suits are barred under clause (d ). The rejection of plaints amounts to decrees and therefore appeals are filed.
( 2 ) THE facts and question of law involved in both the appeals are common and hence they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.
( 3 ) THE brief facts leading to these appeals are that, UCO Bank has given loan by mortgaging some properties. Since default was committed by the borrowers in the matter of repayment, the Bank approached the debt Recovery Tribunal and steps had been taken to sell the mortgaged properties in public auction. At that juncture, the plaintiffs filed the suits for partition of the joint family properties, which also includes the properties mortgaged to the Bank, and obtained status quo order. In those circumstances, the Bank filed I. A. No. II under Order 7, Rule 11 (d) of the CPC requesting to reject the plaints on the ground that suits are barred under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstructi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.