RAM MOHAN REDDY, S.R.NAYAK
YELLAPPA MUDUKAPPA ITAGI – Appellant
Versus
HUBLI-DHARWAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HUBLI – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE intra-Court appeals are filed by the unsuccessful petitioners assailing the order dated 27-3-1998 passed in W. P. No. 21413 of 1994 and batch (Dr. Radhakrishna Co-operative Housing Society Limited, hosur, Hubli and Others v Government of Karnataka and Others ); order dated 30-3-1998 in W. P. No. 19748 of 1997; order dated 25-9-1998 in w. P. No. 28208 of 1998; order dated 6-10-1998 in W. P. No. 22106 of 1996; order dated 24-11-1999 in W. P. No. 4839 of 1997; order dated 17-12-1999 in W. P. No. 44864 of 1999; order dated 27-1-2000 in W. P. No. 44728 of 1999; order dated 6-10-2003 in W. P. No. 27435 of 2003 and order dated 21-11-2000 in W. P. No. 28014 of 1999 by learned Single judge of this Court, upholding the constitutional validity of sub- section (5) of Section 32 of the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 (for short, 'act'), while declining to declare the petitioners to be owners of the civic amenity sites and that the Urban Development authority has no right to deal with the said problem.
( 2 ) THE appellants, either owners of lands or colonizers, with an intention to form an extension or layout, applied to the Commissioner, en
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.