Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Judgement
K. RAMASWAMY, J. :- These five appeals raise four-pronged attack on the constitutionality of the Bombay Land Revenue Code and Land Tenure Abolition Laws (Gujarat Amendment) Act 8 of 1982 (for short "the Amendment Act"). Though unsuccessful in the High Court of Gujarat in Special Applications Nos. 1118 of 1982 and batch by judgment of the Division Bench dated 7/8 September, 1983 (reported in AIR 1984 Guj 157) and followed in Special Civil Application No. 763/82 dated September 16, 1988 the appellants had leave of this Court. A short shift of the antecedent history of land tenures in Saurashtra region of the State of Gujarat is necessary to focus the focal points posed for decision, by common judgment. The appellants are successors of Barkhalidars and Girasdars. The erstwhile Saurashtra State consisted of 220 princely States ruled by Sovereign Rulers in their own rights. The lands in these appeals form present parts of Surendra Nagar and Bhavnagar districts. In the State of Saurashtra, the Rulers entered into agreements with Taluqadars and estate holders and also created a class of interested people known as "Barkhalidars or Girasdars." Various parcels of lands together with
relied on : Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. Union of India
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
State of W.B. v. Subodh Gopal Bose
Dwarkadas Shrinivas of Bombay v. Sholapur Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd.
Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. Union of India
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Singh
Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan v. State of U.P.
considered : Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
State of W.B. v. Bela Banerjee
ravelu Mudaliar v. Spl. Deputy Collector
Union of India v. Metal Corpn. of India Ltd.
State of Gujarat v. Shantilal Mangaldas
Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India
Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan v. State of U.P.
relied on : Bhim Singhji v. Union of India
Achutananda Purohil v. State of orissa
Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam
State of Maharashtra v. Basantibai Mohanlal Khetan
followed : Achutananda Purohit v. State of orissa
distinguished : Digbijaysingji Hamirsinhji v. Nanjisavdas
orissa Cement Ltd. v. State of orissa
Federation of Mining Assn. of Rajasthan v. State of Rajasthan
Jagannath Baksh Singh v. State of U.P.
State of Gujarat v. Kamlaben Jivanbhai
Sri Ram Ram Narain Medhi v. State of Bombay
India Cement Ltd. v. State of T.N.
D.C. Rataria v. Bhuwalka Brothers Ltd.
relied on : State of Maharashtra v. Madhavrao Damodar Patilchand
Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Co. v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.
State of Karnataka v. Ranganatha REDDy
State of Maharashtra v. Basantibai Mohanlal Khetan
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam
Assam Sillimanite Ltd. v. Union of India
Union of India v. Hari Krishan Khosla
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
State of Kerala v. Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Wvg.) Co. Ltd.
Gujarat Pottery Works v. B.P. Sood
referred to : Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
relied on : State of T.N. v. L. Abu Kavur Bai
Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Co. v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.