SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 817

S.ABDUL NAZEER
SUKHSAGAR HOTEL – Appellant
Versus
SUKH SAGAR ENTERPRISES – Respondent


S. ABDUL NAZEER, J.

( 1 ) THE defendant in O. S. 6/2001 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Belgaum, has filed this appeal challenging the Order on. A. No. 1 filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to by their respective ranks before the trial Court.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff has filed the said suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their servants or agents any one of them claiming through them in any manner infringing the plaintiffs well established trade mark 'sukhsagar' or any other trade mark which are in any way deceptively similar to the plaintiffs trade mark and trading style in respect of preparation of food items by using offending trade mark and for certain other reliefs. The plaintiff has averred that it has been using the trade mark 'sukhsagar' since 1976. The artistic work, design and get up in respect of the said trademark exclusively belong to it. The trade mark 'sukhsagar' has become popular all over India and that the said trade mark exclusively belongs to it and none else. At present it is running three branches at Bangalore and




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top