SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(All) 384

A.N.VERMA
VICTORY TRANSPORT CO. PVT. LTD. , GHAZIABAD – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT JUDGE, GHAZIABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.Upadhayay

A. N. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this petition under Article 226 of the Const. , the petitioner who is a plaintiff in a suit pending in the Court of the learned VIII Additional Munsif, Gaziabad, challenges the legality and propriety of two concurrent orders passed by the Courts below- declining to issue a temporary injunction restraining the defendants of the suit from using and displaying their trade name during the pendency of the suit.

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed a Civil suit No. 163 of 198o at Ghaziabad for a permanent injunction restraining, the defendants, from using and exhibiting the name and style of the plaintiff company "in any manner whatsoever," Simultaneously with the institution of the suit the petitioner also filed an application for temporary injunction with the following prayer:--

"it is, therefore, prayed that a temporary Injunction during the pendency of the above case be granted the defendants restraining them from using and exhibiting the name and style of the plaintiff company i. e. , Victory Transport Co. "in any manner whatsoever. "

( 3 ) THIS application was accompanied by an affidavit of one Sri Surender Pal Singh. The affidavit was virtually a repetition o





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top