Karnataka High Court
Judges : Balakrishnayya,Mallappa
M.RAMAMURTHY - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE - Respondent
. . Of .
Decided On : 02/04/1954
obscene writings - Criminal Conviction - Section 292, I. P. C. - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the definition of 'obscene' as per the Indian Penal Code and referred to various legal provisions and interpretations related to obscenity. The court also highlighted the test of obscenity and the impact of publications on young minds. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the effect of the publication on the minds of ordinary young persons in determining obscenity.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, editor of a monthly journal, was convicted under Section 292, I. P. C. for distributing a journal containing obscene writings and pictures. The prosecution and defense presented conflicting opinions on the obscenity of the journal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that while the journal contained some useful material, it also had passages and pictures that could have an undesirable effect on young minds. However, due to weaknesses in the evidence and procedural irregularities, the conviction could not be upheld.
Issues: The issues revolved around the determination of obscenity in the journal, the impact on young readers, and procedural irregularities in the trial.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to consider the effect of the publication on the minds of ordinary young persons in determining obscenity. It also highlighted the mandatory nature of the procedure prescribed in Section 242, Cr. P. C. for stating the particulars of the offense to the accused.
Final Decision: The revision petition was allowed, and the conviction and sentence were set aside.
( 2 ) THE petitioner-accused is the editor of a monthly journal known as 'kama Kala'. The prosecution case is that the accused-petitioner is distributing and has put into circulation this monthly journal which contains obscene writings and pictures. Eleven copies of the journal of different months have been exhibited in the case and three witnesses were examined for the prosecution and according to them the journal contains obscene writings harmful to youngmen and women. On the other hand, the accused has examined two witnesses of whom one is Dr. Puttanna, a retired Surgeon and who was the Principal of the Medical College and the other gentleman is the well-known author Sri Devadu Narasimha Sastry. The Doctor is of opinion that there is nothing obscene in the pamphlets and that it is fit to be prescribed as a text book in medical Colleges and Schools. Sri Devadu Narasimha Sastry is of opinion that he has no hesitation in placing these pamphlets in the hands of children of sufficient age.
( 3 ) WE have been taken through some portions of the pamphlets and before considering the question whether they are obscene it may be useful to state that what has to be considered as obscene or indecent has changed from time to time and may not exactly be the same in different countries. What is tolerated in one country may be considered as bordering on obscenity in another country. It may also be stated that there has been a difference of opinion as to whether young men and women have to be educated on questions of sex and if so, to what extent. Though the tendency in recent times is to consider that young men and women should know something of sex, the orthodox view is still that such a knowledge is dangerous. The intention however of 'legislature is not to prohibit knowledge of sex being spread on scientific lines. What however is objectionable according to law is that a person should not take advantage of the curiosity of young men and women to know something of sex and make money out of publications that will have the effect of depraving their minds.
( 4 ) THE Indian Penal Code has not defined what is meant by "obscene". In "manual of Law terms and phrases" by K. J. Aiyar "obscene" is defined as follows : this term is intended in law to denote what is an offence to public moral and decency. The offences against public moral and decency are (1) selling, distributing, importing, or printing for sale, or hire, or publicly exhibiting any obscene book, pamphlet, paper, drawing, painting, representation or figure; (2) Having in possession any obscene book for sale or exhibition; sections 292 and 293, I. P. C. The test of obscenity according to what has been laid down by Cockburn C. J. in - R. v. Hicklin (1868) 3 QB 360 (A) which is invariably relied on in most of the later authorities on the point is, whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscene is to deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to immoral influences and in whose hands a publication of this sort may! fall. He also observed that the publication must be regarded as obscene if it is calculated to produce a pernicious effect in depraving and debauching the minds of the persons into whose hands it might come.
( 5 ) AS observed in - Emperor v. Harnam Das AIR 1947 Lah 383 (B) : where the book in question was a serious work intended to give advice to married people, and particularly husbands, on how to regulate the sexual side of their lives to the best advantage, that is to say, with a view to promoting their health and mutual happiness. Held : Such books when properly written serve a useful purpose. Such books are published on a large scale and widely circulated in all
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.