SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 261

N.KUMAR
THILLIAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
THANDAVATNURTHY – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the plaintiffs whose suit for declaration of title and other consequential reliefs is dismissed by the trial Court after trial. For the purpose of convenience the parties are referred to as they are referred in the trial Court.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs claim thai, they are the owners of the property bearing Nos. 51, 51a to K (old), New No. 131 situated at veerapillay Street, Civil Station, Bangalore, which is hereinafter referred to as the "schedule properties. " They claim title to the said properties having inherited the same from Sri gangadhara Mudaliar, who is the husband of the first plaintiff and father of the plaintiffs 2 and 3 The said Sri Gangadhara Mudaliar died on 15-5-1970. In the plaint they have set out the geneological tree. The said Gangadhara mudaliar is the last male member of the family. He would be the Bandhu of Sri periaswamy.

( 3 ) THE specific case pleaded by the plaintiffs' is that the schedule property belongs to sri Periaswamy. He died in 1894. Smt. Unnamalaiammal, the daughter of periaswamy had a life interest in the schedule property. She died on 30-7-1964 at Bangalore. On her death, as she was a limited owner, the title to the sche

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top