SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 429

V.JAGANNATHAN
PUTTARAMAIAH – Appellant
Versus
THIMMAIAH – Respondent


V. JAGANNATHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the plaintiff before the trial court and although the suit filed by him in O. S. No. 64/1993 came to be allowed by the trial Court in part, the appeal preferred by the respondents herein came to be allowed by the lower Appellate Court in R. A. No. 15/2000 and the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court was set aside and the suit was dismissed. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court, this second appeal is preferred by the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE facts fall within a very narrow compass inasmuch as the appellant filed a suit for specific performance basing on an agreement of sale dated 16-12-1992 executed by the respondent-defendants and it is the case of the appellant that the respondents-defendants agreed to sell the property, which was the subject mater of the agreement of sale, for rs. 75,000. 00 and received Rs. 55,000/- from the appellant under the said agreement. However, the first respondent-defendant failed to keep up his promise as per the agreement terms giving rise to the appellant filing the present suit in O. S. No. 64/1993 seeking specific performance of the agreement of sale or in the alter

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top