S. ABDUL NAZEER, J.

( 1 ) SINCE common questions of fact and law are involved in all these writ petitions, they are clubbed together, heard and disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) IN these writ petitions, petitioner has challenged the interim order dated 2-4-2007 passed in O. S. Nos. 157, 158, 159, 160, 162 and 163/2006 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dn. ). , Bellary.

( 3 ) THE petitioner is the second defendant in the aforesaid suits. First respondent is the plaintiff and the second respondent is the first defendant. The plaintiff filed the aforesaid suits for a declaration that it is the landlord of the suit schedule premises and to pass a decree of eviction against the first defendant from the schedule premisses. Alternatively, the plaintiff has sought for a mandatory injunction directing the first defendant, his men, agents, servants, assignees, etc. , to continuously pay the monthly rents to the plaintiff from the date of suits till he vacates the premises in question.

( 4 ) IT is the case of the plaintiff that the property is owned by Joint hindu Family firm of Jantakal Gadilingappa and Brothers, represented by its kartha-J. Rajashekar. The second defe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document