SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 559

SUBHASH B.ADI
M. PONNUSWAMY – Appellant
Versus
M. THAMARAI KANNAN – Respondent


SUBHASH B. ADI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is 1st defendant's appeal against the judgment and decree dated 14-10-2004 in O. S. No. 15171/2000. 1st respondent is the plaintiff. 2nd respondent is defendant No. 2.

( 2 ) SUIT is one for specific performance of the contract by executing the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of suit site bearing No. 78 in sy. No. 106 of Kodihalli Village, H. A. Sanitary Board, Varthur Hobli, bangalore South Taluk and No. K formed out in southern portion of Sy. No. 105/a of Kodihalli village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk.

( 3 ) CASE of the plaintiff is that, 1st defendant entered into an agreement of sale dated 10-9-1980 in respect of suit schedule property for consideration of Rs. 15,000/- and advance amount of Rs. 5,000/- was paid on the date of agreement and balance of Rs. 10,000/- was agreed to be paid in installments of Rs. 1,000/- every month till 15-7-1981. Plaintiff paid all the amount as agreed. On receipt of final payment of sale consideration, the 1st defendant delivered vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the plaintiff and 2nd defendant. The 2nd defendant was one of the agreement holder along with the plaintiff, but













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top