SUBHASH B.ADI
M. PONNUSWAMY – Appellant
Versus
M. THAMARAI KANNAN – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is 1st defendant's appeal against the judgment and decree dated 14-10-2004 in O. S. No. 15171/2000. 1st respondent is the plaintiff. 2nd respondent is defendant No. 2.
( 2 ) SUIT is one for specific performance of the contract by executing the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of suit site bearing No. 78 in sy. No. 106 of Kodihalli Village, H. A. Sanitary Board, Varthur Hobli, bangalore South Taluk and No. K formed out in southern portion of Sy. No. 105/a of Kodihalli village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk.
( 3 ) CASE of the plaintiff is that, 1st defendant entered into an agreement of sale dated 10-9-1980 in respect of suit schedule property for consideration of Rs. 15,000/- and advance amount of Rs. 5,000/- was paid on the date of agreement and balance of Rs. 10,000/- was agreed to be paid in installments of Rs. 1,000/- every month till 15-7-1981. Plaintiff paid all the amount as agreed. On receipt of final payment of sale consideration, the 1st defendant delivered vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the plaintiff and 2nd defendant. The 2nd defendant was one of the agreement holder along with the plaintiff, but
REFERRED TO : Jahar Roy (dead) by LRs. and Another Vs. Premji Bhimji Mansata and Another
The Godhra Electricityy Company Limited and Another Vs. The State of Gujarat and Another
C.V. Muni Samappa Vs. Kolala Gurunanjappa (sead) and Others
Mir Abdul Hakeem Khan Vs. Abdul Mannan Khadri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.