SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 392

H.G.RAMESH
SURESH NARAYAN GULAWANI – Appellant
Versus
SMT. VIMALABAI – Respondent


HULUVADI G. RAMESH, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal is filed by the defendants being aggrieved by the judgment and decree by the District Judge in RA 326/1989 dated 28. 2. 2000 in setting aside the judgment and decree of the 1 Addl. Civil Judge, Belgaum in OS 105/1983 in so far as rejecting the relief of specific performance of the contract.

( 2 ) SUIT OS 105/1983 was filed by plaintiff/respondent before the Civil Judge, Belgaum for specific performance of contract against the defendants in respect of the suit schedule property. e. , property in CTS 1438/1 measuring 91 x 14 sq. mtrs situate at Belgaum and also for a direction to execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff accepting Rs. 17,000/- and put the plaintiff in possession of the property and in the alternative, to pass a decree for refund of earnest money of Rs. 12,000/- with interest and to award compensation.

( 3 ) DEFENDANTS 1 to 3 and 5 are the owners of the suit property and defendant 4 is the general power of attorney holder for defendants 1 to 3 and 5. The suit property was agreed to be sold to the plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 29,000/- Accordingly, they entered into an agreement on 27. 8. 1997 and paid an advance o





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top