SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 278

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, H.BILLAPPA
ASSOCIATED CEMENT CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER is a manufacturer of Cement, as also a grouting material known by the Brand name 'shrinkkomp'. It is a registered dealer under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 ('act' for short ). In regard to the assessment periods 1. 4. 1989 to 31. 3. 1990 and 1. 4. 1990 to 31. 3. 1991, the assessing Authority passed orders of assessment dated 25. 2. 1994 and 29. 4. 1994 respectively.

( 2 ) THE petitioner had several grievances in regard to the orders of assessment, two of which are relevant in these revision petitions: (i) taxing of 'shrinkkomp' as 'cement' at 13% as falling under entry 7 of Part 'c' of Second Schedule to the Act; and (ii) subjecting the turnover relating to charges for packing material specified and charged by the assessee separately (without including it in the price of goods) to turnover tax under. Section 6b of the Act. The petitioner therefore filed appeal Nos. KST AP. NOS. 74/94-95 and 91/94-95 before the First Appellate Authority in regard to its grievances. The Appellate Authority confirmed the findings of the Assessing authority in regard to those two aspects, but granted some relief in regard to some other grievances by a common













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top