SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Kar) 431

KULKARNI, LAXMESHWAR
RAMA BAI ALIS MEENAKSHI – Appellant
Versus
MUKUNDA KAMATH – Respondent


KULKARNI, J.

( 1 ) M. F. A. 1736/83 by respondent No. 1 (in the lower court) is directed against the judgment and award dated 21-6-83 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Man galore in M. C. (M. V. C.) 155/80 awarding a compensation of Rs. 67. 000/the claimant in M V. C 155/80 being dissatisfied with the quantum of the compensation, has preferred M. F. A. 22/84.

( 2 ) THE Petitioner-claimant was working as a sub postmaster in Udupi on a gross salary of Rs. 901/- per month. On 13-4-80 the claimant after finishing his work in Mangalore was going to udupi in the bus bearing No. MEG 4458 belonging to respondent No. 1-Smt. Rama Ba. The claimant was seated in the third row on the right side. When the bus reached Padapanambur, a lorry bearing No MEG 6280 belonging to respondent No. 3-Robert D'souza and driven by shekar Poojary came at a great speed and without giving any signal or horn from the opposite direction. e. from Udupi direction to Mangalore. When the bus and the lorry were crossing each other both of them grazed each other. In the course of the accident, the claimant sustained injuries and fracture of the fore-arm. According to the Petitioner, the accident took place
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top