SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Kar) 104

M.SADASIVAYYA, D.M.CHANDRASHEKHAR
T. VENKATASUBBIAH SETTY – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BANGALORE – Respondent


CHANDRASHEKHAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a manufacturer of soaps. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, he has challenged the orders of the authorities of the Bangalore City municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the 'corporation') refusing him licence to carry on manufacture of soaps in the premises in which he has been so doing.

( 2 ) MOST of the material facts are not in dispute. The petitioner has been carrying on the manufacture of soaps in a shed in the compound of premises No. 20. III Block, Jayanagar in bangalore, Jayanagar Extention was formed by the Bangalore City Improvement Trust Board and was outside limits of the Corporation. The petitioner has been residing in the main premises which has been taken on lease. He has obtained the consent of the landlord to carry on manufacture of soaps in that land.

( 3 ) FOR the first time the petitioner made an application to the Commissioner of the Corporation, respondent-1 on 29-1-1964 for the grant of a licence for manufacture of soaps. On 16-4-1964 on endorsement signed by the Health Officer of the Corporation for the Commissioner was issued to him intimating that licence had been refused. He sen














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top