HARI NATH TILHARI
Y. N. GOPALA RAO – Appellant
Versus
D. R. LAXMINARAYANA – Respondent
( 2 ) THE facts of the case in the nutshell according to the plaintiff's case, are that Smt. Sakamma entered into an agreement with the plaintiff on July, 2, 1983 and agreed to sell the suit schedule property in favour of the plaintiff-appellant for a sum of Rs. 1,06,001/- and took an advance of rs. 1,001/- on the date of the agreement. Under that agreement, it was agreed that she will execute the sale deed within 4 months from the date of agreement, after having agreed to receive the balance of sale price of Rs. 1,05,000/- before the Sub-Registrar. It was agreed that expenses necessary for the registration and stamp papers would be taken by the plaintiff-appellant. Before expiry of the peri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.