SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Kar) 235

2008 (3) KLO 138 AC 107 (DB)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V. Gopala Gowda and Arali Nagaraj, JJ.
I.T.A. Nos. 106/2004 and 633/2004
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central - Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Wipro Finance Limited - Respondent
Decided on 2-4-2008

Advocates appearing for:
Common Appellant: Sri E.R. Indra Kumar, Adv.
Common Respondents: Sri D.L.N. Rao, Sr.Col., Smt. S.R. Anuradha, M/s. Rajesh Chander Kumar Assts. Sri A. Shankar and Sri M. Lava, Advs.

Headnote:INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 - Sections 158-BA & 143: [V.Gopala Gowda & Arali Nagaraj, JJ] Assessment -Same income which was assessed as undisclosed income for block period in block assessment - Held, The assessment of undisclosed income relating to block period shall have to be made only in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XIV-B of Income-tax Act, 1961; which provide special procedure for such assessment and that the total undisclosed income relating to the block period which is assessed under the said Chapter shall not be included in the regular assessment of any previous year included in the block period. Hence, the same income which was assessed as the undisclosed income for the block period could not be assessed even on protective basis.

The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central vs Wipro Finance Limited - 2008 Supreme(Kar) 235
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top