SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Kar) 644

2008 (4) KLO 434 AC 376
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
A.N. Venugopala Gowda, J.
Regular Second Appeal No. 372/2003
K.C. Laxmana - Appellant
Vs.
K.C. Chandrappa Gowda and Others - Respondents
Decided on 3-10-2008

Advocates appearing for:
Appellant: Sri Yoganarasimha, Sr. Counsel for Mrs. Namitha Mahesh, Adv.
Respondent: Smt. Shalini John for Sri U. Abdul Khader for C/R1 Advs.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Headnote:LIMITATION ACT, 1963 - Articles 58 & 109: [A.N. Venugopala Gowda, J] Limitation - Suit for declaring that alienation made by father is null and void as the property is joint - Held, It is Article 109 which is applicable and not Article 58 and the limitation is 12 years.

       LIMITATION ACT, 1963 -Articles 109 & 58: [A.N. Venugopala Gowda, J] Limitation - Suit for declaring that alienation made by father is null and void as the property is joint - Held, It is Article 109 which is applicable and not Article 58 and the limitation is 12 years.

K. C. Laxmana vs K. C. Chandrappa Gowda - 2008 Supreme(Kar) 644
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top