(This HRRP is filed u/s 46(1) of Karnataka Rent Act against the judgment and order dated 30.11.2007 passed in HRC.No.10044/2006 on the file of the XV Addl. Small causes Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore, allowing petition filed u/s. 27(2)(a) and (r) of Karnataka Rent Act, dismissing the petition filed u/s 5 of the K.R. Act.)

These three revision petitions are filed by the tenants challenging the order passed in H.R.C.Nos.10044/06, 10045/06 and 10043/06 by the order dated 30.11.07 passed by learned XV Addl. Small Causes Judge (SCCH-19), Bangalore. The said eviction petitions filed by the respondent landlords under Section 27(2)(a), (r) and 5 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 have been allowed granting the petitioners six months’ time to quit and hand over the vacant possession of the schedule premises.

Since common questions arise in these revision petitions, they have been taken up for hearing together and are disposed of by this common order.

Although the schedule premises in the three revision petitions are different, the parties in these revision petitions are common and have common interest.

2. The relevant facts of the case are that respondents who are the landlords had