RAM MOHAN REDDY
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, MANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
JAMIYYATUL FALAH, MANGALORE – Respondent
The petitioner-Employees Provident Fund Organisation constituted under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short 'Act'), aggrieved by the order dated 30-3-2009 in A.T.A. No. 663 (6) 2003 of the Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, Annexure-B, has preferred this petition.
2. The 1st respondent an establishment falling within the definition of the said term under the 'Act', was required to deposit the Provident Fund contributions under Section 6 of the Act read with Paragraph 38 of Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 (for short, 'EPF Scheme 1952'); Pension Fund contributions under Section 6-A of the Act read with Paragraph 3 of the EPF Scheme, 1952; Administrative charges under Paragraph 38 of EPF Scheme 1952; Inspection charges under Section 17(3) of the Act read with Paragraphs 27 and 27-A of the EPF Scheme, 1952; Employees Deposit linked Insurance Fund contribution and administrative charges under Section 6-C of the Act and inspection charges under Section 17(3-A) of the Act.
3. The Petitioner, alleging that the respondent-Establishment failed to pay in time:
(i) The Provident Fund Contributions;
(ii) The Administrativ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.