ANAND BYRAREDDY
K. Dinesh S/o. Sri Kumaraswamy – Appellant
Versus
Kumaraswamy S/o. Late Sivaramaiah – Respondent
These petitions are heard together as common questions of law arise for consideration.
2. The brief facts in each case are stated hereunder:
WP 1428/2009: The petitioner is the plaintiff in a pending civil suit in OS 464/2000, on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Mysore. The suite is for partition and separate possession of a house, which is the suit property. It is claimed to be a Hindu joint-family property of the parties. The defendants, respondents 4 and 5 herein, claimed that the suit property has been agreed to be sold under an agreement of sale dated 21-11-1999, executed in their favour by respondent no. 1 herein. It was also claimed that an advance amount had been received towards the total sale consideration of Rs.8.50 lakh and that the said respondents 4 and 5 had been put in possession of the suit property, under the agreement of sale. Incidentally, respondents 4 and 5 are said to have instituted a separate suit for specific performance of the above said agreement, in suit bearing No. OS 531/2000, before the same court. The said suits are being tried together.
The plaintiff in OS 531/2000, was examined as PW.1 and the agreement of
Avinash Kumar Chauhan vs. VijayKrishna Mishra
Shyamal Kumar Roy vs. Sushil Kumar Agarwal. AIR 2007 SC 637
Peteti Subha Rao vs. Anumala S. Narendra
Ram Rattan vs. Bajrang Lal & others, AIR 1978 SC 1393
Javer Chand and others, vs. Pukhraj Surana
Bondar Singh v. Nihal Singh (2003) 4 SCC 161.
Chandra Sekhar Misra V. Gobinda Chandra Das. (AIR 1966 Ori. 18)).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.