SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Kar) 723

High Court of Karnataka
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
M/s The West Coast Paper Mills Limited
Versus
The Government of Karnataka Represented by its Chief Secretary & Others
Writ Petition No. 30303 of 2009 (T-RES)
Decided on : 15-07-2010

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:R.V. Prasad, Advocate.
For the Respondent: K.M. Shivayogiswamy, High Court Government Pleader.

Headnote:CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT, 1956 - Section 8(3): [Anand Byraredy,J] Extension packages of incentives and concessions - Deferment of payment of tax under KST Act and CST Act - Change of investment policy of Government - Continuance of sales Tax incentives termed as "pipe line projects"- Notification No. FD 204 CSL 208 dated 14.9.2009-In crease in base tax liability - Challenge as to - Held, It is therefore not clear as to how the State Government thinks it fit to put forward the reasoning now assigned to reject the request of the petitioner. The petitioner therefore, has made out a case to claim that it should be bailed out in the circumstances, in such manner as the State Government may evolve as is thought fit in respect of other industrial units within the State who may be similarly placed as the petitioner. Or it may even be said that the petitioner is better placed to deserve the benefit. As the State Government has not thought it fit to withdraw the benefit that has been conferred on the petitioner. However, it is the play of circumstances as stated here in above which has resulted in the present debacle of the petitioner’s state of financial management on account of the upset caused in view of the change in law by the Union Legislature. The measures are warrante din the light of the judgments of the Apex Court which are referred to herein above which have laid down the principles relating to promissory estoppel, and legitimate expectation. Though there is no promise by the State Government to take any corrective measures, with the reduction in the rate of tax under the CST Act resulting in the complete decimation of the incentive granted to the petitioner. The intention of the State Government to continuously provide relief from the burden of tax during the intended period is no longer inexistence and to that extent, the principles can be pressed into service. Even the decision in Kasinka Trading, supra, that an exemption notification can be revoked without falling foul of the principle of promissory estoppel, since it was also found that the Government of India had justified the withdrawal of exemption notification on relevant reasons in the public interest, would have no application in the present case as the Site Government has not withdrawn exemption nor does not it seek to justify the benefit conferred on the petitioner having been rendered illusory, but only assigns a dispassionate reasoning, that it is the misfortune of the petitioner to be faced with the circumstance of the incentive becoming redundant for the reasons stated above. It is therefore necessary for the State Government to reconsider the request made by the petitioner and to evolve measures in order to address the petitioner’s plight and to afford such relief as may be warranted. As already stated, it need not be restricted to the four corners of proposals sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition. The State Government having approached the issue, with a closed mind is unfortunate and therefore, is directed to reconsider the issue.

Judgment :-

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate.

2. The facts briefly stated are as follows:

The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and a dealer registered under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the KST Act; for brevity) under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the CST Act’ for brevity) and the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the KVAT Act’ for brevity).

The Government of Karnataka had extended a package of incentives and concessions to the petitioner vide Order dated 17.8.1994 and incentives in the form of deferment of the payment of tax under the KST Act and the CST Act was extended to the petitioner from the years 1994 to 2006. The petitioner was entitled to avail of sales tax deferment for its project of expansion, modernization and diversification of the petitioner’s plant – which were programmed under what was termed as Phase-I and Phase-II, spread over the period 1994-2006. The base tax liability fixed was in a sum of Rs.4.44 crore per annum.

The petitioner however, envisaged a further expansion and modernization of their existing unit and therefore, had approached the State Government for the grant of fresh incentives and concessions. The Government, by its order, dated 26.4.2000 granted the request. The said further expansion was identified by the petitioner as Phase-III.

The Government of Karnataka had, pursuant to the order dated 26.4.2000, issued a notification dated 5.6.2000, extending the deferment of the taxes payable under the KST Act, in respect of the goods manufactured and sold by the petitioner in respect of Phase III of the petitioner’s plant for a period of twelve years from 2002 to 2014 subject to certain restrictions and conditions enumerated therein. And on similar terms, by another notification also dated 5.6.2000 extended the deferment of tax payable under the CST Act in respect of the goods manufactured and sold by the petitioner in respect of Phase-III for a similar period of twelve years as above.

The Government however, changed its investment policies, and discontinued the incentives and concessions with effect from 1.1.2000. However, Sales Tax incentives were continued in respect of what were termed as “pipe-line projects” of which the petitioner was one, subject to the condition that such projects were completed and commercial production commenced before 1.1.2002. This was extended on the representation of the industrial units concerned, by an order dated 24.3.2004, the Government extended the period upto 30.6.2004, insofar as the petitioner is concerned.

By a Certificate dated 20.5.2004, the Department of Industries and Commerce, endorsed that the petitioner had invested Rs.223.73 Crore on fixed assets in respect of Phase-III of the project and that the petitioner was eligible for deferment on payment of sales tax, both under the KST Act and the CST Act, on the sale of goods manufactured by it for a period of twelve years from the date of commencement of commercial production, from 26.6.2002 to the extent of 80% of the value of fixed assets.

With the ushering in of reforms to bring about a uniform system of taxation known as Goods and Services Tax by the year 2010, the rate of tax payable under the CST Act was sought to be reduced in order to bring about uniformity and it was this object that the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2007, to amend certain provisions of the CST Act was introduced. By virtue of that, with effect from 1.4.2007, in respect of the sale of goods referred to in Sub-section (3) of Section 8 of the CST Act, by a dealer to a registered dealer in the course of inter-state trade, the rate of tax was fixed at 3%/ It also substituted Section 8, whereby sub-section (1) thereof would not apply to any sale in the course of inter-state trade unless the dealer selling the goods furnishes a declaration by the registered














































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top