SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(SC) 61

S. R. DASS, VIVIAN BOSE, N. CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, H. J. KANIA
Collector Of Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Judgment

Das J. -- This is an appeal from the judgment of a Bench of the Bombay High Court (Sen and Dixit JJ.) delivered on 2-2-1917 in an appeal filed under S. 18, Bombay City Land Revenue Act II of 1876 against the judgment of the Revenue Judge at Bombay delivered on 27-10-1947 in a suit filed by the respondents, the Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay and Madusudan Damodar Bhat, the then Municipal Commissioner for the City of Bombay, against the Collector of Bombay.

2. There is no substantial dispute as to the facts leading up to this litigation and they may be shortly stated. In 1865, the Government of Bombay, having decided to construct an Eastern Boulevard, called upon the Corporation of Justices of the Peace for the City of Bombay, the predecessor in title of the respondent Corporation, to remove its then existing fish and vegetable markets from the site required for the construction of the Boulevard. The then Municipal Commissioner Mr. Arthur Crawford, after whom the present municipal market was named, applied for the site set aside for the exhibition buildings on the Esplanade for the purpose of constructing new markets as the existing markets could not be removed u























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top