SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Kar) 170

RAM MOHAN REDDY
Thimma Naika – Appellant
Versus
Papanna @ Kempegowda – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:M/s. Agnihotri Associates, Advocates.
For the Respondents:R1 -H. M. Manjesh, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. This is a plaintiff’s second appeal aggrieved by the dismissal of O.S. No. 25/98 on the file of the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), Hunsur, and the dismissal of R.A. No. 83/02 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) & JMFC, Hunsur.

2. Appellant instituted O.S. 25/98 on 19/3/1998 arragning the 1st respondent as defendant for a direction to the defendant to execute an amended or rectification deed incorporating the correct Sy. No. as 23/2, the extent as 2 acres 15 guntas, and the boundaries on the East and West, as described in the schedule to the mortgage deed dated 29/1/1970, by deleting Sy. No. 72/2, extent 3 acres 3 guntas, in the sale deed executed and registered on 8/2/1971 by one Kempegowda, S/o Kempwgowda.

3. The defendant described as Papanna @ Kempegowda, S/o. Kempegowda and Honga Eramma, on notice entered appearance, resisted the suit by filing written statement interalia denying the execution of the sale deed dated 8/2/1971 conveying 3 acres 3 guntas in Sy. No. 72/2 in favour of the plaintiff and the mortgage deed dated 29/1/1970 in favour of Sanna Naika in respect of 2 acres 15 guntas of land in Sy. No. 23/2. Defendant however admitted that he was the owner of land mea














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top