1. All these writ petitions involve common question of law and fact. Hence, the above writ petitions have been consolidated for common hearing and passing common order. However, for clear understanding, the facts of each case are setout here under: WP NO.817/2008

2. The State of Karnataka -1st respondent constituted 2nd respondent -The Lake Development Authority (Hereinafter referred to as ‘LDA’ for short) for proper management and maintenance of the lakes in and around Bangalore City, initially by virtue of notification vide Annexure M. The 1st respondent issued corrigendum dated 30.6.2003 expanding the jurisdiction of the 2nd respondent over lakes situated in Metropolitan Area of Bangalore and includes the area notified under BMRDA. The lakes in the green belt area are also brought within the jurisdiction of the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent issued public notifications inviting public participation for development of Agara, Nagawara, Vengaiahkere and Hebbal lakes situate within the City of Bangalore.

The 14th respondent who applied for the development of Agara lake was granted the contract vide agreement dated 10.4.2007. 15th respondent was granted the contract for