H.BILLAPPA
T. Thippaiah – Appellant
Versus
Gopamma – Respondent
1. This appeal is by the plaintiff is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 24.03.2009, passed by the I Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in O.S.No.3352/1986.
2. By the impugned judgment and decree, the Trial Court has dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.
3. Aggrieved by that, the appellant/plaintiff has filed this appeal.
4. The respondents are defendants 1 to 6 in the Trial Court. The parties will be referred with reference to their rank in the original suit O.S.No.3352/1986.
5. Briefly stated the facts are:
The appellant/plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.3352/1986 for mandatory injunction, specific performance and declaration that the sale deed executed by the defendants1 and 2 in favour of the sixth defendant is not binding on the plaintiff. The case of the appellant/plaintiff was that the defendants 1 and 2 are the owners of Sy.No.57/2 of Agrahara Dasarahalli village. The defendant No.3 is the Power of Attorney Holder of defendants 1 and 2. The defendants 1 and 2 formed several sites in Sy.No.57/2 and entered into sale agreement with the plaintiff on 28.12.1974 agreeing to sell and reconvey site No.28 formed in Sy.No.57/2 measuring 40' x 60' for
C.G.Govindan Vs. State of Gujarat and others
Chotalal Shaw Vs. Ram golam Shaw and others
Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar Vs. Mohamed Haji Latif and others
Ishwar Dutt Vs. Land Acquisition Collector and Another
Kaliaperumal Vs. Rajagopal & Another
M/s Ceean International Private Limited Vs. Ashok Surana and another
M/s Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd., Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Mahboob Sahab Vs. Syed Ismail and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.