ANAND BYRAREDDY
Shankar, Belgam – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
1. These petitions are heard and disposed of together having regard to the common issue involved.
2. The facts briefly stated are, the petitioner is common in these petitions. He has lodged a complaint against Respondents 2 and 3 for an offence punishable under Section 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’ for brevity) and for an offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as ‘SC.ST Act’ for brevity) and a case has been registered by the Shahapur Police who have4 submitted a First Information Report to the Jurisdictional Court and a case is registered in Crime No.43/2011. The accused had voluntarily surrendered before the Court and had sought for bail. The Court of Sessions Judge has granted bail imposing certain terms and conditions and a charge-sheet had been submitted for the offences punishable under the aforesaid sections and summons had been issued to the accused. It is alleged that the respondents again threatened the petitioner and sought to influence him with regard to the pending case and therefore, viola
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.