ARAVIND KUMAR
Bagmane Constructions – Appellant
Versus
D. Digambarnath – Respondent
1. This appeal is by defendant No. 11 of O.S.No.4743/2012 directed against the order of status- quo passed by trial Court on 21.10.2013.
2. Though appeal is listed for orders by the consent of learned Advocates appearing for parties, it is taken up for final disposal.
3. Plaintiff filed a suit O.S.4743/2012 for declaration of his title to the suit schedule property amongst other declarations sought for and for perpetual injunction. An application for grant of temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from alienating or encumbering the schedule property was also filed. Written statement and also objections to the application for temporary injunction came to be filed by the 11th defendant. An application under Order VII Rule 11 (b) & (d) of CPC came to be filed by 11th defendant. Trial Court by order dated 21.10.2013 passed an order to the following effect:
"Advocate for plaintiff present. Advocate for D-3 present.
Advocate for D-7 to 11 present.
Adv for D-7 to 11 submit that construction is already completed before filing the suit..
Both the parties are directed to maintain status-quo in respect of suit schedule property till next date."
Sd/- Judge
Being aggrieved by this or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.