Heard Sri. C.V. Nagesh, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. B.T. Venkatesh, learned SPPII, who takes notice for respondent – State. Perused the records.

2. The petitioner has sought for quashing of the entire proceedings in Case No. MAG/CR/(107 CRPC)/32/1415 dated 24.7.2014 on the file of the Taluka Executive Magistrate (“TEM” for short), Bangalore East Taluk, Krishnarajapura, Bangalore.

3. Sri C.V. Nagesh, learned Senior counsel fairly submitted that though the order of the TEM is revisable, this court can entertain the petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C., considering the glaring errors committed by the TEM and also to set some standards as to how the Taluka Executive Magistrates have to deal with the matter under the relevant provisions.

4. Learned senior counsel brought to my notice that the Order dated 24.7.2014 is a computerized order keeping open certain blanks. In the impugned order except filling up the case number, date and the provision of law and putting his signature, nothing has been filled up done by the TEM. Even without applying his mind regarding the facts of the case and the legal requirements as contemplated u/s.111 of Cr.PC the TEM h