SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Kar) 782

N.KUMAR, H.BILLAPPA
Nanjamma – Appellant
Versus
Akkayamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: A. Madhusudhana Rao and Sudha S.N., Advs.

Judgment

N. Kumar, J.

1. This is the plaintiffs appeal against dismissal of her suit for partition and separate possession of her share in the suit properties.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties would be referred to as they are referred in the original suit.

3. The suit is filed for partition of vacant sites, house properties (except 7(f) of item No. 1 of the suit schedule) and agricultural lands (Item No. 2 of suit schedule) standing in the name of one Bachappa and the lands in respect of which the grand sons of said Bachappa through his eldest son Late B. Kalappa entered into a joint development agreement with the 13th defendant (Item No. 3 of the Suit schedule).

4. The plaintiff is the youngest daughter of one Bachappa. The said Bachappa had three wives. Through the 1st wife Bayamma, he had a son by name B. Kalappa and a daughter by name Akkayyamma, the 1st defendant in the suit. After the 1st wife's demise, he married Muniyamma and begot the 10th defendant B. Narayanappa. After the death of the 2nd wife, Bachappa married another lady also by name Muniyamma; 18th defendant




























































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top