H.BILLAPPA
C. Somasundaram – Appellant
Versus
S. Rukmini – Respondent
1. This revision by the petitioner is directed against the order dated 30-1-2015 passed by the V Additional Small Causes Judge, Bengaluru, in HRC No. 10014 of 2014. By the impugned order, the Trial Court has rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 43 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.
2. Aggrieved by that, the petitioner has filed this revision petition.
3. Briefly stated the facts are:
The respondent has filed eviction petition against the petitioner under Section 27(2)(a) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. At the stage of evidence, the petitioner has filed application under Section 43 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 praying to stop further proceedings contending that there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the petitioner and the respondent. The Trial Court by its order dated 30-1-2015 has rejected the application. Therefore, this revision petition.
4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has denied the relationship of landlord and tenant between the petitioner and the respondent. The respondent has not produced any documents like lease-deed or rent receipts to show the relationship of landlord and tenant between
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.