SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 386

A.S.PACHHAPURE
Muddoru Rajappa Tipanna – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


ORDER :

An order of the Sessions Judge marking the voluntary statements of the petitioners and admitting them in evidence is challenged in this revision petition.

2. The petitioners herein were arrested for an offence punishable mainly under Section 302 r/w Section 149 of IPC and other minor offences. A charge sheet was presented against them in Sessions Case No.64/2012. While the Trial Court was recording the evidence of PW26 ' the Investigating Officer, the voluntary statement of the petitioners were admitted in evidence and all those statements were marked as Exs.P26 to 30. It is this order of the learned Sessions Judge that is questioned in this revision petition.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned High Court Government Pleader.

4. A perusal of the voluntary statements produced by the petitioners reveal that on their arrest, PW26- the Investigating Officer recorded the said statements on 08.12.2012 and 10.03.2012. In the said statements, the petitioners said to have confessed commission of the murder, narrated the part played by each of them in causing death and the weapon used etc., and their abscondance from the place of incident. Any how scrutin



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top