N.ANANDA
A. R. Phaneendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State By Inspector of Police – Respondent
N. ANANDA, J.—The appellant (hereinafter referred to as ‘accused’) was tried, convicted and sentenced for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(ii), punishable under Section 13{2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the Act’). Therefore, he has filed this appeal.
2. I have heard Sri S.R. Krishnakumar, learned counsel for appellant/accused and Smt. T.M. Gayathri, learned counsel for respondent/Lokayukta and I have been taken through evidence and the impugned judgment.
3. The case of prosecution, in brief is as follows:
During the year 2001, accused was working as an Assistant Engineer in the Directorate of Sericulture, his office was situate at Okalipuram at Bangalore. P.W. 2-Basappa was a Class III P.W.D. Contractor. P.W. 2 used to execute civil works contract entrusted on tender or piece work basis.
During the year 2001, P.W. 2 had been entrusted with two tender works of value of Rs. 1,30,000/- and Rs. 1,45,000/- to be executed in the Government Cocoon Market Building at Chinthamani. In fact, bills in respect of works executed were settled. The accused, who was the Assistant Engineer asked P.W. 2 to do some additional works such as painting, fixing of windo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.