SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Kar) 273

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
M. Rama Jois, J.
Sundareshan —Appellant
Vs.
Superintendent of Police, Kolar —Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 12654 to 12656 of 1983
Decided on : 14-07-1983

The power to suspend a civil servant, including a police officer, is exercisable when disciplinary proceedings are contemplated or pending, and the rules of natural justice, including the right to a hearing, are impliedly excluded in such cases.

Headnote:

Suspension - Police Constables - The court upheld the legality of the suspension of police constables pending departmental enquiry, stating that the power to suspend is exercisable when disciplinary proceedings are contemplated or pending, and that the rules of natural justice, including the right to a hearing, are impliedly excluded in such cases.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, who are Police Constables, challenged the legality of their suspension pending departmental enquiry.

Finding of the Court:

The court rejected the petitions, upholding the legality of the suspension and allowing the petitioners to make representations against the impugned orders before the competent authority.

Issues: The legality of the suspension of police constables pending departmental enquiry and the application of rules of natural justice in such cases.

Ratio Decidendi: The power to suspend a police officer is exercisable when disciplinary proceedings are contemplated or pending, and the rules of natural justice, including the right to a hearing, are impliedly excluded in such cases.

Final Decision: The petitions are rejected, allowing the petitioners to make representations against the impugned orders before the competent authority.

ORDER

1. In these writ petitions the petitioners who are Police Constables, have questioned the legality of the order by which they have been suspended pending departmental enquiry ordered against them.

2. It is not the case of the petitioners that the Superintendent of Police, who has passed the order is not the competent authority to pass the order. The contents of the order indicate that as departmental enquiry has been ordered against the petitioners in connection with the allegations referred to in the impugned order the authority considered that the petitioners should be placed under suspension pending enquiry.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners contended that rules of natural justice demand that before placing a civil servant under suspension pending enquiry, the civil servant should be given an opportunity of making representation against the making of an order placing him under suspension. In support of the contention, learned counsel relied upon a Division Bench judgment of the Bombay High Court in Rajeswara Sayanna v. State of Maharashtra (1983) 1 All. Ind. Ser. L.J. 484. Learned Counsel pointed out that in that case, though a charge sheet had been filed against the petitioner therein, before the court for offenses under Ss. 323, 448, 504 and 506 of the I.P.C., the order of suspension made against him was set aside on the ground that he was not given a hearing before passing the order of suspension and that the ratio of the decision fully supports his contention.

4. It is true that the decision supports the contention of the petitioners. But, with utmost respect to their Lordships I am unable to subscribe to the said view for the reasons which follow.

(i) Relevant part of rule 5 of the Karnataka Police Service (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules reads :

"Suspension Pending Enquiry or Criminal Prosecution :

(1) The Government or the appointing authority or any authority superior to such authority or the authorities specified in column (4) of the schedule may place a police officer specified in the corresponding entry of column (2) thereof under suspension :

(a) Where a disciplinary proceeding against him is contemplated or is pending; or

(b) Where a case against him in respect of any criminal offence is under investigation or trial;

Provided that where an order of suspension is made by an authority lower than the Appointing Authority, such authority shall forthwith report to the Appointing Authority the circumstances in which the order was made.

(5) An order of suspension made or deemed to have been made under this rule may at any time be revoked by an authority not lower than the Appointing Authority.

(6) Where a police officer has been suspended and final orders in the enquiry pending against him have not been passed within a period of six months from the date of order of suspension, the case shall be reported to the Government for such orders as it may deem fit."

5. The power to place a Police Officer under suspension is exercisable only when disciplinary proceedings are contemplated or are pending against him or when any investigation or trial in respect of any offence alleged against him is pending. The above rule is found in the Police Act. The rules which provide for placing a civil servant under suspension pending disciplinary proceedings incorporated under rules regulating conditions of service made under Art. 309 are also similarly worded.

(ii) The object and purpose of placing a civil servant under suspension is to keep him away from a position where he can interfere with the conduct of the enquiry or tamper with the documentary or oral evidence in any manner, or, where, having regard to the nature of the charges against him it is felt that it would be unsafe to continue to vest in him the power of his post.

(See para 19(b) of the G.O. dated 14th December 10, 1957 P-171 at page 179 of the K.C.S. (CCA) Rules with procedural instructions 1961 Edn.)

6. These aspects, in the nature of things cannot be and are



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top