SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Kar) 539

K.S.PUTTASWAMY, S.A.HAKEEM
Commissioner of Gift-tax – Appellant
Versus
K. Bhoomiamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
Mr. K. Srinivasan, for the Appellant
Mr. S.P. Bhat, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

K.S. Puttaswamy, J.—In this reference made under section 26(1) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 (Central Act 18 of 1958) (the Act), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, Bangalore (Tribunal), at the instance of the Revenue, has referred the following question of law for the opinion of this court :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the gift-tax payable, which was agreed to be paid by the donee, has to be deducted, as a consideration within the meaning of section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 ?" In order to appreciate the question referred to us, it is necessary to notice the facts that are not in dispute.

2. Under a deed of settlement dated March 31, 1973 (annexure-A), the assessee settled her half share in a valuable immovable property, a hotel complex known as "Tourist Hotel" bearing Door Nos. 21, 21/1, 21/2 and 21/3, situated on Race Course Road, Bangalore-9, in favour of one Venkatesha Madi of Bangalore, her foster son, with a condition that he shall pay a sum of Rs. 25,000 to one Smt. R. Ahalya and the gift-tax payable by her under the Act and the same was accepted by him with tho



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top