IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
N. Kumar, Ravi Malimath, JJ.
Indus Towers Ltd No. 12 Tower-D, 7th Floor, Subramanya Arcade, Bannerghatta Road Bangalore-560029 (Represented by Sri K M Ashwin Kumar DGM-Finance) and other etc. —Appellant
Vs.
The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Enforcement I. South Zone, Koramangala Bangalore-560047 and others etc. etc. —Respondent
Writ Appeal Nos. 3373-3396 of 2011, Writ Appeal No. 3487 of 2011 and WA 3490 - 3500 of 2011, Writ Appeal No. 3488 of 2011 and Writ Appeal Nos. 3502-3512 of 2011. Writ Appeal Nos. 3461-3472 of 2011, Writ Appeal No. 4454 of 2011 and Writ Appeal Nos. 5675-5697 of 2011. Writ Appeal No. 4455 of 2011 and Writ Appeal Nos. 5813-5871 of 2011, Writ Appeal No. 15226 of 2011and Writ Appeal Nos. 15304-15326 of 2011. WA 15227 of 2011 and Writ Appeal Nos. 15293-15303 of 2011, Writ Appeal Nos. 15228-15229 of 2011 and 15519-15542 of 2011, Writ Appeal Nos. 15230-15231 of 2011 and Writ Appeal Nos. 15259 to 15292 of 2011, Writ Appeal No. 5987 of 2011 and Writ Appeal Nos. 15470-15480 of 2011 Writ Appeal Nos. 3403-3439 of 2011
Decided on : 07-09-2011
It is well settled that, whether the transaction amounts to transfer of right or not cannot be determined with reference to a particular word or clause in the agreement.
1. All these writ appeals are preferred against the common order passed by the learned single Judge. None of the parties are happy with the order. Therefore, everyone has preferred appeal against the said order to the extent they are aggrieved of such order. Therefore, these appeals are taken up for consideration together and disposed of by this common order. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed to in writ appeal No. 3403-3439/2011 arising out of W.P. No. 11508/2011 and 12693-12727 of 2011.
FACTUAL MATRIX
The assessee - M/s. Indus Towers Limited is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office in New Delhi and engaged in providing Passive Infrastructure and related operations and maintenance services to various telecommunication operators in India on a shared basis. The assessee is registered with the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) for providing Passive Infrastructure Services to mobile phone operators. The nature of services provided by the assessee was envisaged by Government of India initiative "MOST" (Mobile Operators Shared Towers). The DoT in a bid to create a high quality, low-cost, rapid, wide coverage mobile telecommunication network in India sought to propose, through the project "MOST', a system of sharing of passive infrastructure by the various telecom service providers.
2. The main object of sharing the infrastructure is for ensuring economy by avoiding multiple Telecom sites for different Mobile Service Providers in the same area. This concept was mooted and promoted by the Ministry of Telecommunications, Government of India, under the project nick-named as 'MOST', with an objective of reducing the number of towers and thus, optimizing the capital and operational expenditure of the Mobile Service Providers. Under this project, the concept of possibility of multi-technology (GSM and CDMA) and multi-operators (up to six operators) sharing a single tower with a view to bring down cost and enhance spread of affordable services continued to be carried out successfully by the industry.
3. The assessee has been registered with DoT for providing such shared Passive Infrastructure Services to various telecommunication operators in India. For the said purpose, the assessee owns or acquires and possesses or will acquire or possess certain telecommunication sites, infrastructure and equipments in various licensed Circles in India. For providing the said services, the assessee has entered into identical Master Services Agreements with telecom operators such as Airtel, Tata Tele Services Limited, Vodafone, Reliance, BSNL, Loop, Uninor, Idea Cellular Limited etc. Under the agreements, the telecom service providers are charged by the assessee for the "Site Access Availability" i.e., for the access granted to them to the passive infrastructure, owned and possessed by the assessee and for the related operation and maintenance services offered by the assessee for the effective and efficient use of the passive infrastructure. These charges are in the nature of service charges and are not in the nature of consideration received for transfer of property or for transfer of right to use any goods. The passive infrastructure is not just tower as erroneously understood in the notice, but, also other equipments such as DG sets, air conditioners, power management systems, batteries and other electrical works. The assessee provides required services along with the sharing of passive infrastructure i.e., tower sites and shelter rooms for installation and safe keeping of equipments (like antenna, microwave radios and Base Transreceiver Station (BTS)) belonging to telecom operators, while other equipments at the site like air conditioner, power grid connection, D.G. sets, power management systems, batteries, electrical wiring etc., are used to ensure 24 x 7 power supply and to convert 240 Volts AC current into -48 DC current required for smooth running
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.