2015 Supreme(Kar) 1270
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Ram Mohan Reddy, J.
Concord India Private Limited and Ors. – Appellants
Vs.
Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore North Sub-Division and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition Nos. 21849/2015 (KLR-RR/SUR), 28347-348/2015 (KLR-RES), 27746/2015 (KLR-RES), 27198/2015 (KLR-RR/SUR), 40436-438/2015(KLR-RES) and 34753-760/2015(KLR-RES)
Decided On : 14-10-2015
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :R.V.S. Naik, Adv. for T. Suryanarayana, Advocate
For the Respondents: D.S. Ramachandra Reddy, Spl. Govt. Adv.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of permission under the Karnataka Forest Conservation Act, 1980 for diversion of forest land and the lack of jurisdiction and competence of the Assistant Commissioner under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.
Headnote:
Official Memorandum - Challenge over the official memorandum dated 23.4.2015 - Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (KLR Act), Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966 (KIAD Act) - The court discussed the challenge over the official memorandum dated 23.4.2015, which directed mutation of land to the Forest Department and the exercise of jurisdiction under Section 71 of the KLR Act. The court highlighted the legal provisions of the KLR Act and KIAD Act, the interpretation of forest land, and the requirement of permission under the Karnataka Forest Conservation Act, 1980 for diversion of forest land. The court found the order impugned to be illegal, arbitrary, and a colorable exercise of power, and quashed the order and all preceding proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The challenge was over the official memorandum dated 23.4.2015, which directed mutation of land to the Forest Department and the exercise of jurisdiction under Section 71 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (KLR Act). The petitioners alleged that the land was declared an industrial area under the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966 (KIAD Act) and neither the revenue department nor the Forest Department had any right, title, or interest over the said lands.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the order impugned to be illegal, arbitrary, and a colorable exercise of power, bordering around contempt of court. The court quashed the order and all preceding proceedings.
Issues: The issues included the jurisdiction and competence of the Assistant Commissioner under the KLR Act, the legality of the directions to change entries in the revenue records, and the requirement of permission under the Karnataka Forest Conservation Act, 1980 for diversion of forest land.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the requirement of permission under the Karnataka Forest Conservation Act, 1980 for diversion of forest land, the lack of jurisdiction and competence of the Assistant Commissioner under the KLR Act, and the violation of principles of natural justice in not affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitions, quashed the order dated 23.4.2015 of the Assistant Commissioner and all preceding proceedings, and sequentially quashed any orders passed by the Tahsildar in terms of the directions.
Ram Mohan Reddy, J.
1. Since common questions of law and that of fact arise for decision making, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, petitions are clubbed together, finally heard and disposed of by this order.
2. In all these petitions, the challenge is over the official memorandum dated 23.4.2015 whereunder the Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore North Sub-Division, Bengaluru, directed:-- (i) Tahsildar, Bengaluru East Taluk, to mutate by recording the name of "Government Forest Department" in respect of Sy. No. 1 measuring 711 acres of Kadugodi Plantation, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, against Column No. 9, and 12 (2) while against column 11 to record "Dinnur colony" in the RTC pahani, in accordance with Rules and regularize such entries; (ii) transfer of the said lands to the Forest Department and; (iii) liberty to the Revenue Department to exercise jurisdiction under Section 71 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, (for short 'KLR Act'), in the event, the Forest Department does not utilize entire extent of land, in so for as left over portion to be utilized for any public purpose and re-appropriate that portion for such public purpose as may be warranted, a deeming fiction that Forest Department had surrendered/transferred the lands to the Revenue Department.
3. The grievance of the petitioners, in common, is that the State Government exercising jurisdiction under Section 3(1) of Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966 (for short 'KIAD Act') declared 148 Acres 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 1 of Kadugodi Plantation by notification dated 4/10-8-1970 as an industrial area and by another notification dated 5/10-8-1970, declared that Chapter VII of the said Act would come into force, prior to coming into force of Karnataka Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 with effect from 25th October 1980 and therefore, neither the revenue department of the State nor the Forest Department have any right, title or interest over the said lands. It is the further allegation of petitioners that the Assistant Commissioner had neither jurisdiction nor competence to pass the order impugned, under the 'KLR Act'.
4. Learned counsel for petitioners in each of the petitions, while reiterating the averments in the memorandum of writ petitions submit that on an earlier occasion, action initiated by the Forest Department claiming the said lands as reserve forest, some of the petitioners filed W.P. 7200/2008 called with W.P. 29765-66/2009, whence, by common order dated 25th May 2012, recorded findings of fact that the land in Sy. No. 1 of Kadugodi Plantation was not 'reserve forest' which order, subject matter of challenge in W.A. Nos. 4283/2012 c/w 4205/2012 filed by the State is pending before the Division Bench. Learned counsel further submit that State having suffered the order, the Assistant Commissioner without applying his mind, on the basis of an order dated 13.4.2010 in W.P. No. 12322/2008 which was set-aside in W.A. No. 2650-58/2010 by order dated 18th November 2010 passed the order impugned, contrary to the findings recorded in W.P. No. 7200/2008 and connected petitions by order dated 25th May 2012, subject matter of pending writ appeals.
5. Learned counsel further submit that the order impugned suffers from an error apparent on the face of the record due to violation of principles of natural justice, in not affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. In addition, it is submitted that the Assistant Commissioner without authority of law directed reserving liberty to the revenue department to invoke Section 71 of the 'KLR Act', in the event Forest Department did not utilize the entire portion of the land and put to use the non-utilized portion for public purpose while deeming it to have been surrendered/transferred to the revenue Department.
6. On 13.07.2015 the following order was passed in W.P. 21849/2015:
"Sri D.S. Ramachandra Reddy, learned counsel submits that he is the Special Counsel entrusted