The appellant/applicant has filed this miscellaneous first appeal against the order dated 16.3.2017 made in A.A.No.196/2016 on the file of the LXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City (CCH 62) dismissing the application filed by the applicant under Section 9(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

I. THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE:

2. The applicant filed an application under Section 9(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for grant of injunction restraining the respondent or its officials or its servants or any other persons claiming through under it from obstructing the ingress and egress of the staff, officials, public visitors, water tankers, horse ambulance, grass truck to the schedule property contending that the appellant is a non-profit company incorporated under Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 and is engaged in the business of promoting sports in General and Equestrian activities in general.

3. It was further contended that since last four decades, it was operating an Equestrian Center wherein training in horse riding and other related activities were carried on in the said property. The said property also comprises a stable where e