B.S.PATIL
Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
Chandayya Poojari – Respondent
B.S. Patil, J. - In these writ petitions, petitioners are calling in question the order dated 16-2-2012 passed by the Land Tribunal, Moodabidare, Mangaiuru Taluk, thereby allowing the interim application filed by the tenant-respondent 1 herein seeking amendment of Form 7 filed by him.
2. The dispute raised in these writ petitions has got a checkered history. Respondent 1 herein claimed as tenant of certain lands. He filed Form 7 under Section 48-A(1) of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act'), seeking grant of occupancy rights in respect of four survey numbers viz.: (1) Sy. No. 23/4 measuring 85 cents; (2) Sy. No. 23/7 measuring 17 cents; (3) Sy. No. 22/4 measuring 66 cents; and (4) Sy. No. 138/2 measuring 52 cents, all situated at Hosabettu Village of Karkala Taluk, Mangaiuru District. He claimed that he was cultivating the lands in question for the last more than 50 years.
3. The Land Tribunal held an inquiry and passed order dated 24-9-1981 granting occupancy rights in respect of all the aforesaid lands including another Sy. No. 138/IB measuring 80 cents, which was not mentioned in Form 7 and in respect whereof, claim for grant of occupancy rights was no
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.