S.ABDUL NAZEER, K.S.MUDAGAL
Horticontracts, Rep. by its Sole Proprietor, Sri. P. Muralidharan – Appellant
Versus
Agrihorticultural Consultants – Respondent
1. Since common question of law and facts are involved in all these cases, they are clubbed together, heard and disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The above appeals and cross objections arise out of common judgment and decrees dated 28.09.2015 in O.S. No. 213, 214 and 281/2011 passed by the IV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. By impugned judgment, the trial Court allowed applications of the plaintiff under Order 12 Rule 6 of CPC and decreed all the three suits for the amount mentioned as below:
O.S. No. 213/2011
Rs. 21,59,213/-
O.S. No. 214/2011
Rs. 6,97,862/-
O.S. No. 281/2011
Rs. 29,69,497/-
Further, the trial court rejected the claim of the plaintiff for interest at 18% p.a.
3. Sri. P. Muralidharan S/o G. Parthasarthy is the common defendant in all the above three suits. M/s KSG Farm and Nursery represented by Sri. P. Mukundan is the plaintiff in O.S. No. 213/2011. M/s Agrihorticultural Consultants represented by its Proprietrix Smt. Lalitha Mukundan is the common plaintiff in O.S. Nos. 214 and 281/2011.
4. Against the above sai
Alok Shanker Pandey vs. Union of India and Others
Badat and Co. vs. East India Trading Co. AIR 1964 SC 538
Charanjit Lal Mehra and Others vs. Kamal Saroj Mahajan
Cref Finance Limited vs. Shanthi Homes Pvt. Ltd. Company, Bangalore
Karam Kapahi and Others vs. Lalchand Public Charitable Trust and Another
Nagindas Ramdas vs. Dalpatram Ichharam alias Brijram and Others
Uttam Singh Duggal & Co. Ltd. vs. United Bank of India and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.