SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Kar) 335

S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
K. Yellappa S/o Kakappa – Appellant
Versus
N. Manju S/o Narayana Reddy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Sri. Sreenivasaiah A, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Sri. B. Pradeep, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. The appeal of the insurer is preferred aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal in fastening the liability as regards negligence and the appeal by the claimants is preferred aggrieved by the inadequacy of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, and are disposed by taking up for final disposal, after admitting the same with consent of both parties.

2. The facts as made out in the claim petition is that on 15.8.2013 at about 11.45 a.m., one Vijay (deceased) was proceeding as pillion rider of motor cycle bearing Registration No.KA51EF0901 and when the said motor cycle had reached near GVS College, Soppahlli-Anekal Chandrapura Main Road, a TATA goods vehicle bearing Registration No.KA-51-A-5736 being driven in a rash and negligent manner approaching in the opposite direction, dashed against the motor cycle and the deceased – Vijay son of Yellappa suffered grievous injuries and succumbed to the said injuries and died. In spite of medical treatment, the same being not fruitful, he died immediately thereafter. The claim petition was resisted by the insurer contending that the











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top