1. The matter came up for preliminary hearing ‘B’ Group on 05.01.2018 and Miss Varsha R. Iyengar, learned counsel for the petitioners was heard in full, none appears for the respondent. In order to give one more opportunity, Court has directed to post the matter next week. Again, when the matter was posted on 12.01.2018, Court directed to post the matter next week. Again, on 19.01.2018, though case called twice, none appears for the respondent. In order to give one more opportunity, finally, one week’s time was granted to the learned counsel for the respondent to address his arguments, failing which the matter would be heard on the next date of hearing on behalf of the petitioners. Even though, on two occasions, time was granted for the respondent’s counsel to appear and argue, none appears for the respondent. Therefore, this Court has no option except to proceed with the hearing of the counsel for the petitioners.

2. The legal representatives of the original plaintiff filed the present writ petition against the order dated 29.08.2015 on I.A. No.5 made in O.S. No.236/2009 rejecting the application filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff under Order 6 Rule