SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
Barghavi – Appellant
Versus
B. C. Tarakesh – Respondent
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR, J.
1. All these appeals are disposed of by common judgment though they have arisen from the judgments in different suits. The point to be decided in all these appeals is same.
2. RFA 1013/2014 and RFA 1014/2014 have been preferred by common plaintiff in the suits O.S. 734/2012 and O.S. 735/2012 on the file of City Civil Judge, Bengaluru. RFA 1816/2016, RFA 1024/2018 and RFA 1025/2018 are filed by the respective defendant in the suits O.S. 8844/2014, O.S. 1098/2016 and O.S. 1103/2016.
3. In all these suits defendants are the tenants and their eviction was sought by the respective plaintiff/plaintiffs from the property which was leased to him/them. For narration of the pleadings briefly, the parties are referred with respect to the position of each of them in the respective suits.
4. In O.S. 8844/2014, it is the plaintiff's case that he let out a property bearing 52/1, 17th Cross, 10th Main, Malleswaram, Bengaluru, to the defendant for her bakery business by entering into lease agreement with her on 27.3.2008. The initial period of lease was five years with effect from 1.11.2007 to 31.10.2012. The tenanted premises consists of ground floor measuring 1,20
Ram Kumar Das vs. Jagdish Chandra Deo
Janki Devi Bhagat Trust, Agra vs. Ram Swarup Jain
Mohammad Ahmad and Another vs. Atma Ram Chauhan and Others
Park Sheet Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dipak Kumar Singh and Another
Samir Mukherjee vs. Davinder K. Bajaj and Others
Bandhu Machinery Pvt. Ltd. vs. Om Prakash Sikka and Others
Manohar Kumar Kankaria and Another vs. Sk. Md. Shawkat and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.