SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 545

S.SUJATHA, MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
Siddanagouda Natural S/o Nanagouda Patil Adopted Son of Siddangouda Patil – Appellant
Versus
Kashibai @ Kantamma W/o Siddangouda Patil – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri. J.S. Shetty, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. Ashok S. Kinagi, Advocate For Are Served But Unrepresented)

JUDGMENT :

Defendant Nos.3 to 49 are in appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge at Basavanabagewadi ['Trial Court' for short] in O.S.No.95/2004 dated 08.10.2010.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to as per their status before the Trial Court.

3. Facts of the case: The plaintiff has filed the suit in O.S.No.95/2004 for the relief of declaration that she is the owner of the suit properties and for consequential relief of direction to the defendants to deliver possession of the suit properties to the plaintiff. The suit was originally filed for the relief of permanent injunction, alternatively declaration and consequential relief of possession was sought for. On the memo filed by the plaintiff, restricting her alternative prayer of declaration and possession and giving up her prayer for injunction, the same was allowed and accordingly the amendment in the plaint was carried out by deleting the prayer of permanent injunction.

4. The suit was filed originally against the defendant Nos.1 to 3. Defendant Nos.4 to 49 were impl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top