SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 1002

ARAVIND KUMAR, BELLUNKE A.S.
Kum Mohit – Appellant
Versus
Rajeevan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
B.M. Patil, Adv., Ravindra R. Mane, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ARAVIND KUMAR, J.

1. This is a claimants' appeal for enhancement of compensation, not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the IX Addl. District and Sessions Judge and Addl. MACT, Belagavi in M.V.C. No.282/2014 dated 07.04.2016.

2. Claimants being the minor son, father and mother of deceased Vijay Khannukar filed a claim petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act seeking compensation of Rs.1,50,00,000/-. It was contended that deceased along with his wife Smt. Smitha and other relatives had proceeded to Sankeshwar in a car to have Ganesh Darshan and while returning to Belagavi on National Highway 4, at about 01:00 p.m. near Ontamuri Ghat, a truck bearing registration No.MH-04/DD-7475 coming from opposite side deviation from Belagavi side towards Sankeshwar was driven in high speed and that too negligently dashed to the road divider and crossed over to the other side of the road and dashed against the incoming vehicles including the car bearing registration No.KA-22/P- 4586 driven by deceased Vijay Khannukar. It was further contended that due

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top