SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 1003

ARAVIND KUMAR, BELLUNKE A.S.
New India Assurance Co Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Mahankalamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ravindra R. Mane, Adv., Y. Lakshmikant Reddy, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ARAVIND KUMAR, J.

1. These two appeals have been filed challenging the judgment and award passed by MACT-II, Bellari, in M.V.C.No.837/2012 whereunder claim petition filed by wife, minor children and parents of deceased Veeresh (father of the deceased died during the pendency of the appeal) has been allowed in part and compensation of Rs.7,20,000/- has been awarded.

2. M.F.A.No.22012/2013 is filed by the Insurance Company/Insurer of offending vehicle and M.F.A.No.24615/2013 is filed by claimants not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation. Hence, we have taken up these two appeals together and heard the arguments of learned advocates appearing for the parties namely Sriyuths R.R.Mane, learned counsel appearing for insurer and Sri Lakshmikant Reddy, learned counsel appearing for claimants.

3. A claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act was filed by the claimants seeking compensation of Rs.24,70,000/- on account of death of Sri Veeresh in a road traffic accident that occurred on 19.05.2012 contending interalia that deceased Veeresh had boarded a bu

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top